User:Rmhermen
 | This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years. |
Admin
[edit]I am a Wikipedia:administrator since July 5, 2004. I first contributed to Wikipedia in April of 2001 (oldest edits lost in early software upgrades). My first edit with my username appears to be on April 26. I have been active on a number of online projects - active and passive (SETI@Home, Distributed Proofreaders, Mars crater labeling, Stardust@Home, Folding@Home on the Wikipedia team: Team page, etc.)
| Action | Count |
|---|---|
| Edits | 61504 |
| Edits+Deleted | 64867 |
| Pages deleted | 3958 |
| Revisions deleted | 14 |
| Pages restored | 30 |
| Pages protected | 80 |
| Pages unprotected | 9 |
| Protections modified | 23 |
| Users blocked | 101 |
| Users reblocked | 1 |
| User rights modified | 1 |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]User-reported
[edit]- 65.140.214.186 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Further vandalism after final warning. Dormskirk (talk) 18:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. No warnings since December, current edit appears unrelated to the previous ones, so likely different user assigned to that IP address. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:21, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- WBASchool (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Semz community (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Luke Jones is an idiot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "idiot" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Gooner Coomer 2030 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. ♥ Melody ♥ 04:36, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Travelsguide (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Also spamming (on multiple projects). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:46, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- VCSDPBC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. SDPBC is short form of the School District of Palm Beach County. VC might be a role. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:15, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Sportsagencybrazil (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:21, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Techno alliance (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Goldlandian Federal Investigations Department (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:33, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:08, 20 February 2025 (UTC)- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. My search could find no entity named "Goldlandian Federal Investigations Department"; they've made edits about Roblox, I'm guessing is some fictional entity within the game. 331dot (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Whoeverchangeditisaliar (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of username policy as disruptive, likely intended to attack other editors. Toast1454 (talk) 15:41, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Fxckhellboy (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. ⟲ Three Sixty! (talk, edits) 16:28, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Not only has this account never made a single edit, but it was created over 2 years ago. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Whoops. For some reason, it just showed up today in metawiki abuse filters. Feel free to close without action. ⟲ Three Sixty! (talk, edits) 17:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Cyber Bangla (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:Cyber Bangla/sandbox; organizational name. Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:43, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Luke Jones is an idiot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Patient Zerotalk 21:44, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Luke Jones is not a real person. Luke Jones is an idiot (talk) 21:45, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The GA status of this article about one of the UK's most notable schools has been nullified by persistent additions of unsourced trivia and PoV and general interference over the years by IP editors. School articles attract a lot of nonsense. There is a project to restore this article to GA but it firstneeds first to be long-term protected. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Over the past couple of days, I've edit warred back-and-forth with an IP over the fact that Griffin Peebles participated in the Abu Dhabi round instead of Dan Skocdopole. The IP has continued to revert my edits, even after listing multiple proofs on the article's talk page. I would like to request a temporary semi-protected page status, or a protection for pending changes. For more details and context, please check this discussion at the ANI here. SportscarFan2004 (talk) 23:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:40, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:43, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing by IP users. I've tried to get to the bottom of what their issue is on their talk page; rather than answering, they continue the disruptive editing. Swinub★ 23:27, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:48, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indiscriminate use of flagicon and unprovoked removal of references by IP users. Pinineeon (talk) 01:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of irrelevant content by IP who has so far refused to engage in discussion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:13, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - Ratnahastin (talk) 02:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced additions. (CC) Tbhotch™ 03:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IPs persistently adding unsourced content and being disruptive. Two might be the same IP though. StephenMacky1 (talk) 13:15, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 13:33, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Ip address is constantly adding picture in wrong sizes and destroys the composition of the page. In addition, information is given without source Mgfdhsrhe (talk) 13:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Ip vandalism changing boxoffice figure. Multiple reverts happened. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 15:05, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple disruptive attempts(failed) at redirecting the article. - Ratnahastin (talk) 15:12, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
User(s) partially blocked: 172.59.154.0/23 (talk · contribs) (from Oklahoma). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:31, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. - Ratnahastin (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been the target of a Greek IP-hopper since at least 2 November. Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2a02:587:b00::/41 (talk · contribs). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after recent protections expired. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:53, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/AC target since 06:06, 8 February 2025. Alith Anar 17:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:22, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Community sanctions enforcement. Eastern Europe antisemitism ctop RaschenTechner (talk) 18:27, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – article is under constant attack by biased/right wing editor(s) hiding behind IP, see article history. Denniss (talk) 18:44, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2601:188:C580:78D0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page per WP:CT/AP. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No constructive edits here. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 18:46, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Note: Already pending changes, which seems to be working ok — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:49, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs vandalizing this article for quite sometime now, adding texts like "Raza Bukhari has a Crush on Bajwa". -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. EndzoneEnthusiast 20:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Unhelpful removals by a specific IP range since November 2024.[1][2][3][4] The article was protected in November 2024 due to disruptive edits by IPs. Mann Mann (talk) 20:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated IP address edit warring U-Mos (talk) 20:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For a few months, until the Trump matter dies down. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 21:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Annh07 (talk) 21:20, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:25, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism of dynamic ip. Last for few days now. [[5]], [[6]], Theonewithreason (talk) 21:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it hasn’t been vandalized recently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.83.200.39 (talk) 17:49, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – The article is not protected due to vandalism, but because of excessive addition of unsourced/inadequately sourced content. Anyhow, the current absence of disruption is likely a consequence of the protection. The history of the article as well as your own recent track record speak against unprotecting the article. Favonian (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I would like to request if my son's page could be restored. I just learned that since his passing in 2018 that the page he created prior to is no longer found. I am his father and would like to update it and protect it for all time. Please let me know if you are able to assist or where I should look for such.
Blessings, Ron — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:a901:cb00:c477:fa1:4dc:3634 (talk) 02:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- There's never been any article at that title on the English Wikipedia. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:36, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- I think this could be read as Jhaysonn Pathak was a contributor here and created a page, title unknown, but there is no user account of that name either. I left a message on the IP talk page. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 6 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:32, 20 February 2025 (UTC) |
| 20 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
It is my 8th year of editing (4th with this account). I have written a number of articles of various types and none have been permanently deleted. I have made mistakes, but understand what they were and how to avoid them. About to publish many geography stubs (manually written, differing in content, not violating MASSCREATE - see Ledenice and Zapeć for examples). Articles like Cirsium greimleri, First Vrbnik Breviary, Petər Klepəc and Veternica are more representative of my work, though. Ivan (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
91 main space articles, 45 rated above stub, no deletions. I mostly create articles for albums or BLPs of musicians. GanzKnusper (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
I know my first articles are... bad, but my recent pages, Yumeshima Station, Meitetsu KiHa 10 series, Meitetsu 3400 series, and Resignation services should be good without being patrolled. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
The user has created 189 articles, and only two have ever been deleted—with one later restored. They have a strong understanding of reliable sources (WP:RS) and are well-versed in BLP policies (WP:BLP). I've reviewed one or two of their articles, and I believe they truly deserve the rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I would like to use AWB for repetitive editing tasks. I do these a lot for the projects I am a part of, and they have become very tedious. Edit: one of the projects I am a part of for a Church, does not have very many active contributors but a very large backlog. The effort to maintain the articles we have would be largely simplified by using AWB. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 21:49, 17 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
This is a (new) alt account of User:RedactedHumanoid, and has been created with the sole purpose to edit articles that I do not want to edit on my main account (NSFW articles, etc). Most of these articles are semi-protected, so I am requesting confirmed rights so I can edit those pages. RedactedHumanoid66 (talk) 23:05, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Arcticocean requested that, "If [I] wish to gain [ECR] again, the onus would be on [me] to prove that trust has been regained." To address this challenge, I would like to respond to the two concerns raised:
I hope this explanation demonstrates my commitment to addressing the concerns raised and regaining trust. Michael Boutboul (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
I was previously an editor here with an extended confirmed account (User:M3ATH). I am now on this account and would like the extended confirmed right to be transferred. MT(710) 16:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit]
I will facilitate an editathon on 5 March at this event. saebou (talk) 19:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I have authored a few articles, improved the quality of many articles including adding high quality references and improving encyclopedic quality. I have also limited experiences in deletion. I also have just been granted AFC reviewer options and starting to increase my participation in that. Welcome feedback if I can qualify. Thanks for the consideration Trex32 (talk) 00:19, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Though I predominantly work with redirects, at least recently, I also engage with new pages and would like to help further in the new pages patrol in reviewing for quality and to help with the backlog. I have made almost 46,000 edits and believe that I can help. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:30, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to be a new page reviewer, I continuously contribute to New Pages and having failed the previous request to be one, i would like to try once again having positively learned more and contributed to much more new pages. Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 07:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
I have authored a few articles, commonly support and help new editors, and enjoy helping the community by encouraging proper creation of articles and assisting with maintenance. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 21:48, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
I mostly engage with improving new pages like adding cats, short desc., etc. and also quite active in AFD, would like to help further in the new pages patrol in reviewing for quality and to help with the backlog. AgerJoy talk 17:38, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello again, I was granted NPR for the January backlog drive, and reviewed 48.4 in total. I was planning to do a lot more, but I quickly learnt it's best to stick with subjects I'm familiar with, mainly English football, so didn't end up doing much beyond that. Anyway, I'd like to continue reviewing. I doubt I'll be a prolific reviewer, but otherwise happy to handle what I come across, and participate in future backlog drives as required. I only had a couple of re-reviews, so I welcome any admin to check over other reviews I've made. Thanks. CNC (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag. |
|---|
Page mover[edit] |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia and focused on editing articles, reviewing new pages & combating vandalism. I am requesting for PCR right to speeding up the review process for pending changes. I am familiar with key Wikipedia content policies, including vandalism, biographies of living persons (BLP), neutral point of view (NPOV), verifiability, and copyright compliance. I've also been involved in patrolling recent changes, where I use Twinkle tool to revert vandalism. With my experience and understanding of these policies, I believe that I can effectively contribute to reviewing pending changes. 𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 20:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
I'm well familiar with Wikipedia policies. And in my spare time I am always on duty to combat any vandalism or violation of Wikipedia policies. This right will serve me well. Thanks! Vellutis (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
I understand pending change policies well, in addition to my knowledge of general Wikipedia editing policy/procedure. I would like to further contribute in this way. Thanks. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 00:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
I patrol recent changes, mainly for vandalism, but I also get in contact with a lot of pending changes and like to help. I am familiar with the related policies. Squawk7700 (talk) 18:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting reviewer rights to help improve the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia articles, particularly in areas related to Pakistan and some notable international articles like television shows and international cricket. I also created a page Kana Yaari directly, which is a result of my performances on Wikipedia. I have gained experience through consistent and constructive editing, and I am familiar with Wikipedia's content policies, including neutral point of view, verifiability, and reliable sourcing. I aim to assist in maintaining the integrity of semi-protected pages and contribute to the efficient review of pending changes. Currently I'm a auto confirmed user rights. Sackiii (talk) 20:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
after 2 years I got alot of editing, wanna test another experience. thanks QalasQalas (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I've recently come across several instances where rollbacking would be faster than manually reverting nonconstructive consecutive edits. I don't patrol Recent Changes, but I am quite active and have more than 3,100 pages on my Watchlist. Thanks for your consideration. PRRfan (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |
I am at about 70,000 edits aross all Wiki projects.
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Minor edits make a major difference. —Gaff ταλκ 04:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Ahh, a sigh of relief from IvoShandor to Rmhermen, thanks for your work on articles related to the Black Hawk War. IvoShandor 05:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is for that quick and poisonous work you did on the Ayina River. Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
Templates I use often but never remember
[edit]- {{NorthAmNative}} {{WikiProject Michigan}} {{WikiProject Protected areas}} {{river}}
- (Wikipedia:Template_messages/Image_namespace)
- {{fact}}{{no license}} {{no source}} {{or-fu-re|Image:replacementimage}} {{Orphaned fairuse not replaced or {{or-fu-nr}} *{{PD-USGov-Interior-NPS}} {{subst:deletedpage}} {{globalize/USA}}{{intro-missing}}
 |
WP:AIV |  |
WP:ANI |  |
WP:NPP |  |
WP:RPP |  |
WP:RFR |  |
WP:AFD |  |
WP:XFD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
CAT:CSD |  |
WP:CSD |  |
WP:RM |  |
WP:RAA |  |
WP:DR |  |
WP:TM |  |
WP:TT | ||||||
 |
WP:RCU |  |
WP:LOP |  |
CAT:AB |  |
WP:BS |  |
WP:RD |  |
WP:NFC |  |
WP:IUP |
Help box by Jennavecia (talk · contribs)
"Do you want to take a survey?"
[edit]On Feb. 12, 2005, I did a random pages survey. Out of 100 random pages, only 1 was a U.S. town. That's progress. Three towns in the UK, 1 in Spain and 1 in Portugal also turned up. Overall biographies were the largest category at 22%, followed by geography with 15% total. Then Lists at 7%, Disambiguation pages at 6%.
On Feb. 24, 2006, I repeated the 100 random page survey, this time getting 5 U.S. towns. Overall, geography had 26%, biography 21%, fiction 9%, music 4%, colleges 4%, lists 3% and disambigs 4%. Clearly geography and biography are our largest areas. Music, science and business scored less than I expected. Non-individual History was hardly discernable.
Even by Feb. 2005, 100 out of almost 500,000 was not statistically significant but was as much as I had patience for.
Wikiprojects I am a member of:
[edit]- Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Space missions
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan
Short To Do list
[edit]- add maps to cities in Chad
- have done ten largest plus A-Biltine (plus Doba, Faya-Largeau, Goz Beïda, Guéréda, Mao, Ouara) from List of cities in Chad
- sources for Hook and Cod wars
- History of camping
- User:Rmhermen/sandbox
- reduce repetition between Chemical Weapons Convention, Chemical weapon proliferation, Destruction of chemical weapons, Chemical weapon#Disposal and Chemical warfare
- Pueblo Chemical Depot - full destruction in Sept 2016
- Joan Walsh Anglund
Early Anon work, no need to bug the developers
[edit]Up to Dec 16, 2003, all the edits at these anonymous id's were mine (59 edits):
- User:64.152.154.140
- User:64.152.153.104
- User:166.90.233.102
- User:65.25.234.xxx
- User:64.7.163.180
- User:64.152.153.139
- User:63.212.148.98
- User:64.152.159.57
- User:64.152.154.147
More recently 1,250 or so edits on 75.41.110.200 are apparently all mine. Apparently my new ID is 75.41.109.190. There are undoubtedly many others as the earliest history of many articles was not preserved by the software.
List of most of my original pictures and some maps
[edit]For copyright declaration purposes The following photographs and diagrams on Wikipedia were taken by and uploaded by me and released under GNU-FDL:
- Update March 21, 2006 by searching with Interiot's Tool (no longer updated - [13] does edit counts though)
Pictures
[edit]
Maps
[edit]- Image:Michigan map.png
- Image:Toledo Strip.png
- Image:Les Cheneaux Islands.PNG
- Image:Blackfeet Indian Reservation map.PNG
- Image:1999_west_nile_map.png, and the others in article
- Image:US execution methods.png
- Image:Lake of Egypt.PNG - an unimproved map
- Image:Upper Peninsula of Michigan.png
Numerous locator maps for U.S. national parks like Image:LocMap Big Bend National Park.png and Image:LocMap Tongariro National Park.png - most now replaced by dynamic map system
